AI
AEye, Inc. (LIDR)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- AEye’s Q1 2025 was operationally constructive with first Apollo units produced at Tier 1 partner LITEON, NVIDIA DRIVE integration in final test phase, and 20+ customer engagements, but financials remain de minimis (revenue $0.06M) and losses persist; management signed two POC contracts in ITS and defense, adding non-auto near-term revenue options .
- No S&P Global consensus was available for Q1 2025 revenue/EPS; therefore, no beat/miss determination can be made (consensus not available).
- Guidance: raised FY25 cash burn outlook to $27–$29M (from $25M) due to a litigation settlement and potential cash repayment of part of the convertible note; underlying burn unchanged, with Q2 burn elevated before trending to ~$5M/quarter in 2H25 .
- Liquidity: $25.9M cash and marketable securities at quarter-end, and ~$(74)M potential liquidity including ELOC/ATM facilities; management reiterated runway to mid-2026, but noted Q2 cash burn will reflect the lease settlement outflow .
- Potential stock catalysts: completion of NVIDIA integration and OEM ecosystem activation, conversion of 20+ engagements into POCs and deployments, and Apollo B-sample deliveries in Q2 2025; offset by higher FY25 cash burn and ongoing micro revenue scale .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Apollo manufacturing line at LITEON is operational; first units produced with B‑sample deliveries to OEMs expected in Q2 2025, a key production-readiness milestone .
- NVIDIA DRIVE integration reached final independent testing phase, which should open broader OEM access through the platform once validation completes .
- Early commercial traction outside automotive: 20+ active technical engagements and two signed POC contracts (ITS and defense), offering nearer-term revenue opportunities and market diversification .
- Quote: “We achieved a critical step toward mass production of Apollo, with the first units coming off the manufacturing line of our Tier 1 supplier partner, LITEON.” – CEO Matt Fisch .
-
What Went Wrong
- Financial scale remains minimal: Q1 revenue of $0.06M and gross loss of $0.03M underline the early commercialization phase and lack of material top-line contribution .
- Cash burn outlook increased to $27–$29M for FY25 (from $25M) due to lease settlement and potential cash repayment under the convertible, implying higher near-term cash needs than previously expected .
- Near-term cash burn to rise in Q2 from the lease settlement payout; Q1 included ~$3.1M of one-time payroll timing, and financing-related costs also weighed on net loss per management .
Financial Results
Notes:
- Q1 cash burn rose on one-time items and will be elevated in Q2 due to lease settlement; management targets a ~$5M quarterly run-rate thereafter .
- Non-GAAP excludes stock-based comp, issuance costs, fair value changes, gain on lease termination, and other items per company reconciliation .
KPIs and Operating Milestones
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We achieved a critical step toward mass production of Apollo, with the first units coming off the manufacturing line of our Tier 1 supplier partner, LITEON.” – CEO Matt Fisch .
- “Apollo has entered their final independent testing phase [on NVIDIA DRIVE]… completion… opens up NVIDIA’s ecosystem and allows us to scale our conversations into more OEMs.” – CEO Matt Fisch .
- “Excluding financing costs, first quarter cash burn was $8 million… we typically see higher cash burn in the first quarter and expect it to come down in subsequent quarters… a normalized run rate for us is about $5 million per quarter.” – CFO Conor Tierney .
- “We’ve resolved our lease dispute… reducing potential cash liability exposure from $6.4 million to $1.4 million.” – CFO Conor Tierney .
- “We are… in advanced negotiations on several proof‑of‑concept contracts… we’re seeing intelligent transportation systems and security as early standout opportunities where Apollo has a clear edge.” – CFO Conor Tierney .
Q&A Highlights
- Cash burn trajectory: Q2 burn to be ~“$6M‑ish” due to lease payout, then trend to ~$5M per quarter; Q1 burn elevated on seasonal one-time payroll and financing costs .
- Convertible note: 15‑month schedule; first two payments made in cash; noteholder can accelerate monthly (some accelerations satisfied in equity), with company electing cash/equity at its discretion .
- NVIDIA timing and manufacturing scaling: Integration completion is a sales catalyst within NVIDIA’s OEM ecosystem; manufacturing scale will follow OEM contracts; sufficient inventory for near-term demand, with flexible scaling via LITEON .
- Near-term revenue bridge: Two signed POCs (ITS and defense) reduce dependence on longer auto cycles; non-auto price points higher though volumes lower, aiding path to profitability against ~$25M annual burn rate .
- TAM context: Automotive volumes dominate but ITS alone represents a ~$20B TAM across sensor modalities; AEye targets use-case leadership with long-range 1550nm, behind-windshield-capable Apollo .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global (Capital IQ) consensus estimates for AEye’s Q1 2025 revenue and EPS were not available; therefore, no beat/miss determination can be made for the quarter (consensus not available).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution momentum: Apollo moved from pilot to first production units at LITEON; watch Q2 B‑sample deliveries and completion of NVIDIA’s independent testing as near-term catalysts .
- Commercial pipeline: 20+ technical engagements with two signed POCs in non-auto verticals provide earlier revenue optionality; track conversion of POCs into deployments over ~6‑month cycles .
- Cash and runway: ~$25.9M cash and securities with ~$(74)M potential liquidity and runway to mid‑2026, but FY25 cash burn raised to $27–$29M and Q2 burn elevated by lease settlement; funding cadence and note repayment mix are key watch items .
- Operating leverage: GAAP and non-GAAP OpEx declined sequentially; management emphasizes a capital-light model and flexible Tier 1 scaling; monitor OpEx discipline as volumes begin .
- Product differentiation: 1550nm, behind-windshield, long-range (up to 1 km) performance and software-defined configurability remain core differentiators that may command OEM attention amid Level 3 ADAS programs .
- Risk balance: Minimal current revenue, increased FY25 burn, and dependency on OEM timelines offset positive technical and manufacturing milestones; non-auto POC progression is an important de-risking signal .
Management and Document Citations
- Q1 2025 8-K/press release and financial tables: .
- Standalone Q1 2025 press release: .
- Q1 2025 earnings call transcript: .
- Q4 2024 press release and transcript for prior-quarter comps: .
- Q3 2024 press release/8‑K/transcript for two-quarters-back comps: .
- Related Q1 2025 press release (LITEON first units): .